A new invasion, or what happens next

From our previous study we knew that body size evolution of mammals on islands is strongly influenced by ecological interactions, or said more simple, when competitors and / or predators are around, body size of the focal mammal will not or hardly change. When there is not a single competitor or predator, body size change may be spectacular, as we saw for Elephas falconeri, the Pleistocene dwarf elephant of Sicily, that reduced so much in size that in the end it was just 2 percent of the body mass of its ancestor. The big question now is, what happens when a new colonization of the island takes place? What if a new dormouse manages to reach an island where there is already an endemic dormouse? The endemic dormouse may have become gigantic after thousands of years of evolution in isolation. The prediction is that the new, tiny dormouse stands no chance against this big brother. The opposite is, however, true. Generally, the new invasion is successful. This is one of the reasons that insular biodiversity is so vulnerable. We studied the pattern through time for 19 endemic small mammals across four large islands. We found that initially, these small mammals all became large as predicted. Then, after a new colonization (or invasion), something interesting happened. A reverse took place, the endemic mammals became smaller again. At second thought, this was to be expected. The new invasion meant the introduction of a competitor, and in some cases a predator as well. Under such ecological conditions, body size increase is only moderate. The endemic mammal was in fact too large for the new ecological setting and evolution went backwards. In most cases, however, not for long, as often the old endemic eventually lost the competition and went extinct. This study made it clear that evolution is driven by interaction and is not a sole business, each species on its own. From the article: Body size evolution of palaeo-insular mammals: temporal variations and interspecific interactions, by A.A.E. van der Geer, G.A. Lyras, M.V. Lomolino, M.R. Palombo and D.F. Sax, in Journal of Biogeography(2013) 40, 1440–1450.

Contextual evolution on islands

On islands, large mammals get small and small mammals get large. However, there are many exceptions with a lot of scatter around the general, graded trend. So what with the island rule? What causes these deviations? Our idea is that insular body size of mammals results from various selective forces whose influence varies not only with characteristics of the focal islands and the focal species, but also with interactions among species (ecological displacement and release). Our results, based on regression tree analyses, support this hypothesis of contextual body size evolution of insular mammals. While there may exist a theoretical optimal body size for mammals, in general, the optimum for a particular insular population varies in a predictable manner with characteristics of the islands and the species, and with interactions among species. This study did, however, produce some unanticipated results that merit further study – patterns associated with Bergmanns rule are amplified on islands, and body size of small mammals appears to peak at intermediate and not maximum values of latitude and island isolation. Lomolino MV, Sax DF, Palombo MR, van der Geer AAE. Of mice and mammoths: evaluations of causal explanations for body size evolution in insular mammals. Journal of Biogeography 39 (5): 842-854. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02656.x/abstract

Evolution of Island Mammals

Our book on the Evolution of Island Mammals, Adaptation and Extinction of Placental Mammals on Islands is out! Wiley-Blackwell published it this August. For a quick overview of contents and artwork, visit the online library of Wiley (move mouse over book cover shown to the right of this post). A second option is simply to order it.

If you are interested in the evolution of insular mammals, from the Eocene walking sirenian (Pezosiren portelli) of Jamaica to the recently extinct Falkland Wolf or Fox (Dusicyon australis) of the Falkland Islands and the still living island fox (Urocyon littoralis) of the Californian Channel Islands, this book is a must. It offers a complete overview of all fossil and most recently extinct mammals that once upon a time lived on islands somewhere on our planet. They were fully adapted to their environment, and often evolved bizarre features, like elongated, club-like antlers with hardly any tines (the deer Candiacervus of Crete), ever-growing front teeth (the bovid Myotragus of Majorca), enormous size (the cavia-like Amblyrhiza of the West Indies) or pygmy size (the hominid Homo floresiensis of Flores).

Unfortunately, the majority of them went extinct, often after spectacular long periods of gradual evolution in situ, when mainland colonisers discovered the islands and their fauna. Today, just a few islanders survived, in comparison with the number of islanders of the remote past. Their special features are unique, but in most cases less spectacular than seen in the fossil record, when elephants could shrink till a mere one or two percent of the body mass of their ancestral size (as in the case of Elephas falconeri).

To have an idea of how extreme evolution can be, you have to see the fossil islanders!

'Hobbit' skull found in Indonesia is not human indeed

Since its first description in 2004, Homo floresiensis, or the Hobbit of Flores, has been attributed to a species of its own, a descendant of Homo erectus, Homo ergaster or another early hominid, such as Australopithecus. Non-believers however hold the new species for a pathological form of modern humans, Homo sapiens, or just a dwarf human like the Neolithic inhabitants of the very same island. Karen Baab and colleagues applied landmarks on the skull, and concluded Homo floresiensis is a species on its own, and related to hominins of 1.5 million years ago. We did the same, half a year earlier, and reached similar conclusion but dare to put one step further. We applied geometric morphometric analysis to the type skull of Homo floresiensis (LB1) and compared it with skulls of normal Homo sapiens, insular Homo sapiens (Minatogawa Man and Neolithic skulls from Flores), pathological Homo sapiens (microcephalics), Asian Homo erectus (Sangiran 17), African Homo habilis (KNM ER 1813), and Australopithecus africanus (Sts 5). Our analysis includes specimens that were highlighted by other authors to prove their conclusions. The geometric morphometric analysis separates the 'hobbit' from all modern humans, thus including both the pathological and the insular forms. It is further impossible to separate the 'hobbit' skull from Homo erectus. The very early hominin Australopithecus falls separately from all skulls.

Visual inspection of the skulls learned that the cranial shape of Homo floresiensis is most close to that of Homo erectus and not to that of any modern human. Apart from cranial shape, some features of Homo floresiensis are not unique but are shared with other insular taxa, such as the relatively large teeth (shared with Early Neolithic humans of Sardinia), and changed limb proportions (shared with Minatogawa Man).

We thus conclude that Homo floresiensis is a direct descendant of Asian Homo erectus and has no relation neither to primitive australopithecines nor to modern Neolithic pygmy people of Flores.

By G.A. LYRAS, M.D. DERMITZAKIS, A.A.E. Van der GEER, S.B. Van der GEER, J. De VOS. 2008. The origin of Homo floresiensis and its relation to evolutionary processes under isolation.© 2008 The Anthropological Society of Nippon

For free pdf, click here http://users.uoa.gr/~glyras/projects/Homo-floresiensis.pdf

Or go to the publisher http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/ase